$2,000 FREE on your first deposit*Please note: this bonus offer is for members of the VIP player's club only and it's free to joinJust a click to Join!
Exclusive VIPSpecial offer

­čöą Casino Gaming | Video Poker vs. Blackjack | Part II

Card clumping strategy blackjack you
  • Licensed and certified online casino
  • 97% payout rates and higher
  • 100% safe and secure
  • Exclusive member's-only bonus
  • Players welcome!

Blackjack card clumping strategy

Sign-up for real money play!Open Account and Start Playing for Real

Free play here on endless game variations of the Wheel of Fortune slots

  • Wheel of WealthWheel of Wealth
  • Wheel of CashWheel of Cash
  • Fortune CookieFortune Cookie
  • Wheel of Fortune HollywoodWheel of Fortune Hollywood
  • Wheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme SpinWheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme Spin
  • Spectacular wheel of wealthSpectacular wheel of wealth

Play slots for real money

  1. Make depositDeposit money using any of your preferred deposit methods.
  2. Start playingClaim your free deposit bonus cash and start winning today!
  3. Open accountComplete easy registration at a secure online casino website.
Register with the Casino

VIP Players Club

Join the VIP club to access members-only benefits.Join the club to receive:
  • Slot tournaments
  • Monthly drawings
  • Loyalty rewards
  • Exclusive bonuses
  • Unlimited free play
Join the Club!

You can practice your conventional strategy (based on the then myth of random cards), only to find that when you get into the casino something is seriously´┐Ż... Click to Play!

Logic dictated that for a very simple card counting strategy, simply keep track... the whole theory of card clumping and shuffle tracking though. Click to Play!

Counting cards is only one way to win at blackjack.. Then when this clump of 10 cards is getting ready to be dealt you make a bigger bet. Basic strategy says that if you have a hard nine against a dealer eight you should hit. Click to Play!

Clumping is not a way to get an edge over the casino.. Similar to basic strategy, but the proper play is based upon the exact cards dealt to the player rather´┐Ż... Click to Play!


The taking of Atlantic City


At blackjack, you can get ´┐Żbasic strategy´┐Ż cards, which tell you how to play.. That is, if a player knows that a clump of cards has a whole lot of.
A fellow who purchased my new Blackjack Bluebook II wrote me a letter.. In fact, he quoted another blackjack manual which says the cards clump together so. the drawing strategy of the players combined with; imperfect´┐Ż...
Is card clumping real and how does it affect blackjack play? Can a blackjack player using a cheat sheet or a strategy card when sitting at a blackjack table in the´┐Ż...


Can You Count Cards At Online Blackjack?


Is Non-Random Shuffle Tracking a Viable Alternative to Card Counting Systems in Blackjack? - Blackjack ChampBlackjack Champ Blackjack card clumping strategy


Full Tilt Poker Rush Poker Review Strategy amp Bonus Learn Pro Blackjack What is a. Blackjack FAQ Card Counting Deviation Shills Card Clumping Wizard of´┐Ż...
Logic dictated that for a very simple card counting strategy, simply keep track... the whole theory of card clumping and shuffle tracking though.
The chance of winning that many consecutive blackjack hands are 1. Someone who plays ´┐Żbasic strategy´┐Ż ´┐Ż a statistics-driven guide to splitting cards,. ´┐ŻThere can be clumping, for example, when all small cards come out.



YouTube


blackjack card clumping strategy
REAL WORLD SHUFFLE-TRACKING STRATEGIES. A glossary of blackjack, card counting, and shuffle-tracking.... Also, they fear like-card clumping (the
We all have clinically determined that card clumping patterns, like the ones. COMPAQ BLACKJACK - "THE ART OF WAR" is not just a strategy....it is a weapon!

blackjack card clumping strategy Several weeks ago, a poster at one of the blackjack sites, spiderman, posted accusations of cheating at El Cortez via 2 blackjack tables with newer model automatic shuffle machines, alleging that the machines have a function capable of non random, high card clumping huge advantage to the house.
Spiderman had accumulated months of data on the specific tables in question.
Noted blackjack mathematician and expert Don Schlesinger confirmed that if Spiderman's data was accurate, the numbers indeed, revealed card clumping out of the normal range of randomness.
Despite that a number of players, noted similar finding and suspicions, the site's owner moved the thread to what he call's the disadvantage forum voodoo forum.
That thread was also reposted by a member at WoV, but gained little traction as known casino employee members shot it down.
Spiderman has now proven his suspicions by obtaining one of the model ASM's in question and confirming that there is a feature, accessible by a entering a code, that will stack the cards in a nonrandom manor, high card clumping, that is very advantageous to the house casino.
I don't want to get into who m spiderman might or might not be.
Some of us have discussed that in private.
But I think this warning is worth repeating for blackjack players blackjack card clumping strategy play against ASM's not to be confused with continuous shuffle machines.
It smacks of shades of the whole "mindplay" incident and eventual ruling that went against the casino industry.
Below is a link to the thread.
Several weeks ago, a poster at one of the blackjack sites, spiderman, posted accusations of cheating at El Cortez via 2 blackjack tables with newer model automatic shuffle machines, alleging that the machines have a function capable of non random, high card clumping huge advantage to the house.
Spiderman had accumulated months of data on the specific tables in question.
Noted blackjack mathematician and expert Bet blackjack strategy agree Schlesinger confirmed that if Spiderman's data was accurate, the numbers indeed, revealed card clumping out of the normal range of randomness.
Despite that a number of players, noted similar finding and suspicions, the site's owner moved the thread to what he call's the disadvantage forum voodoo forum.
That thread was also reposted by a member at WoV, but gained little traction as known casino employee members shot it down.
Spiderman has now proven his suspicions by obtaining one of the model ASM's in question and confirming that there is a feature, accessible by a entering a code, that will stack the cards in a nonrandom manor, high card clumping, that is very advantageous to the house casino.
I don't want to get into who m spiderman might or might not be.
Some of us have discussed that in private.
But I think this warning is worth repeating for blackjack players who play against ASM's not to be confused with continuous shuffle machines.
It smacks of shades of the whole "mindplay" incident and eventual ruling that went against the casino industry.
Below is a link to the thread.
I just had a long conversation with ZenKing and he confirms final, max cards dealer blackjack rather the El Cortel is indeed cheating on the ASM Machines and not only that but they are using pre-shuffled Chinese decks as well constantly cheating on all BJ games.
On another related note.
I talked to the Slots Manager who I have known over 20 years.
He is a polish prick, none the less, with a pretty famous AP brother.
That is another story though.
However when I talked to this manager he confirmed that many people daily are getting hit in the head and eyes with flying dice all over this Casino.
Mostly beside the Cage where they keep these older, longer Crap Tables.
I just had a long conversation with ZenKing and he confirms that the El Cortel is indeed cheating on the ASM Machines and not only that but they are using pre-shuffled Chinese decks as well constantly cheating on all BJ games.
Spiderman's accusations are not fueled by losing, nor regular negative variance.
It is based on noticing unusual distribution, documenting almost 200 shoes of play and finally obtaining an actual shuffling machine of the model in question, which has confirmed there is a feature, accessible by entering a code that will clump certain groups of cards together in a non-random order favorable to the house.
The top gaming attorney is advising spiderman.
Unfortunately there are legal issues how the machine continue reading obtained which could make that problematic.
But for now, I just think players should be warned.
Check it out for themselves.
Play or not play.
I say recreational players because standing a pat 20 is a no-brainer, so clumping a bunch of tens that result in a bunch of pushed twenties is bad for those players.
The hands that are random force them to make decisions where they might make the wrong ones.
I actually hate it.
Yes, indeed this will impact everyone, card counters and recreational players alike.
Yes, you are basically correct in your understanding.
The games in question are two specific double deck tables at El Cortez that have these newer model ASM.
Several other tables have the older model 3.
Those games and tables are not in question.
However, any blackjack game using the newer model ASM are susceptible.
So the way it works, is when in a specific mode, accessible by a code, the shuffler will clump a 14 or 15 clump of cards containing 12 or 13 ten value cards.
Now the machine doesn't know where that clump will be placed in the deck s.
That will be determined by the player cutting.
So sometimes this high card clump comes out towards the front, some times in the middle and sometimes it doesn't come out, as it is behind the cut card.
All three of those scenarios are favorable to the house and it makes no difference how many players are playing.
So there are 2 things you will notice.
When the high card clump comes out there real money online blackjack be a round or two where almost every hand of 20 pushes with the dealer 20.
The entire rest of the deck s are depleted of high cards.
The second thing that a card counter will notice is TC's of either -4 or lower, or +4 or higher, every single shoe.
If the high card clump comes out at the beginning of the shoe, the count will be extremely negative.
If the high card clump comes out at the end of the shoe or doesn't come out after the cut cardthe count will be extremely positive prior to the high card clump.
For card counter's this means they will be raising their bet with the high count, only to push for a round or two with 20's while losing all the other rounds when all small cards are coming out because the deck is depleted in 10 value cards.
If you want to bump, that would be great.
I am interested in this information reaching as many players as possible.
What they choose to do or not do with the information is entirely up to them.
However, I can guarantee, the WoV casino employee contingency will dismiss and discredit it immediately.
I actually hate it.
Yeah, you might want to hold off on that for now.
I know there is going to be some challenges filed, initially with gaming, possible involving the courts depending on what happens with gaming.
The participants involved are just trying to figure out who which sucker is going to be the face of such a challenge.
There was some hope that Michael might want to be, but that has faded.
There really is no money involved.
The plaintif is not going to win a big settlement of anything.
Even if a challenge were to win, it is near impossible to show what your damages are.
What a "win" would look like is a ruling against the shuffle machine manufacturer and any casinos using that technology, with likely fines involved to the casinos.
The object is to stop this from spreading before it gets started.
I think there is some danger to writing a story about it prior to whatever action is going to occur.
For card counter's this means they will be raising their bet with the high count, only to push for a round or two with 20's while losing all the other rounds when all small cards are coming out because the deck is depleted in 10 value cards.
Have any simulations been done to determine if the high-card clumping favors the house?
If the count is high, then the expectation is for more 10-valued blackjack card clumping strategy to be dealt, which is advantageous to the players.
If share blackjack counting chart can 10v cards are not clumped together, then what is the expected distribution of the 10v cards in a +4 situation that is more favorable to the players, such that the dealer is less likely to be dealt a 20 than are the players?
For instance, if the cards were hand-shuffled rather than machine-shuffled, are the players less likely to get a 20 if the count is high, or is it the dealer who is less likely to get a 20?
If the high cards are not clumped, and low cards are mixed in as expected with the 10v cards, then who is more likely to be dealt the low cards?
The second part of your statement above just does not sound reasonable.
For card counter's this means they will be raising their bet with the high count, only to push for a round or two with 20's while losing all the other rounds when all small cards are coming out because the deck is depleted in 10 value cards.
Have any simulations been done to determine if the high-card clumping favors the house?
If the count is high, then the expectation is for more 10-valued cards to be dealt, which is advantageous to the players.
If the 10v cards are not clumped together, then what is the expected distribution of the 10v cards in a +4 situation that is more favorable to the players, such that the dealer is less likely to be dealt a 20 than are the players?
For instance, if the cards were hand-shuffled rather than machine-shuffled, are the players less likely to get a 20 if the count is high, or is it the dealer who is less likely to get a 20?
If the high cards are not clumped, and low cards are mixed in as expected with the 10v cards, then who is more likely to be dealt the low cards?
The second part of your statement above just does not sound reasonable.
Of course, not all, coach belly.
That was a generalization.
But the rest of the deck is highly -EV for the player.
All those times that players, counters and basic strategy players stand because the dealer has a "bust card" card up?
Well with a depletion of high cards, the dealer is pulling 4 and 5 cards 20 and 21's instead of busting.
Whether or not that high card clump could still be beneficial to the player depends on if aces are mixed into that clump at the normal random number.
Some players observing these high card clumps state they are not, meaning a below "normal" or random number of blackjacks dealt, which is where the player advantage REALLY comes from in card counting.
Spiderman has not confirmed this yet.
I am sure that is one of the things he wants to confirm or deny.
If the aces are still mixed in at "normal" rates, then direct me to the nearest card clumping ASM.
It would simply be a matter of recognizing where the clump is and playing source depleted rounds differently hitting some hands that you normally would stay on.
Kewl-since I didn't see the original thread-only the link that you provided here-and for now disregarding his obtaining a machine, is 200 shoes enough of a sample size?
I am one that believes that all casinos cheat, and that slot machines are blackjack card clumping strategy, etc.
So I want to believe him.
But I wonder as to sample size.
Kewl-since I didn't see the original thread-only the link that you provided here-and for now disregarding his obtaining a machine, is 200 shoes enough of a sample size?
Enough of a sample size to prove anything beyond a doubt?
Enough of a sample size to raise the possibility and invest funds to take the next step in investigating.
But I am getting into a lot of trouble here that I didn't intend to.
Getting heat from all sides.
Places I didn't foresee.
Going to have to step out for the moment and let things play out.
I just blackjack card clumping strategy to say, if this is is true there's a way to take advantage of it.
You are telling me this a little late don't you think?
In the last 24 hours I have been under attack from all sides.
Someone claiming to be associated with shufflemaster, threatening me.
AP's, some who I considered friends, pissed at me, for outing a play, calling me traitor.
One threatened to reveal my name and address.
I am the bad guy here I guess.
But let me tell you how it really went down.
I am a card counter.
I never claimed to be the brightest bulb in the pack.
I dabble in other AP, if it's not too complicated, but mostly I am a card counter.
Card counting is how I have supported myself and made the vast majority of my living for 15 years now.
So as a card counter, I come across a situation, that I identified as cheating and bad for blackjack players, card counters and non-card counters regular players alike.
And I wanted to 1.
So it turns out, just as you said, there are members in our community that figured this out before me and have found ways to exploit it.
AND they are now pissed at me.
But here's the problem.
I didn't come up with this yesterday, out of the blue.
I first noticed this months ago and have been collecting data.
I didn't want to make such an allegation, without being reasonably sure.
And during this time, I have mentioned this several times on various sites, including the first thread I started just over 2 weeks ago, click the following article the same time I contacted you and several other AP's about my concerns.
So knowing that I was heading down this road, at no time did any of these AP's contact me.
Give me a heads up.
How about something like "hey you might not want to travel down that road".
And I still think someone needs to be looking out for card counters AND non-card counter traditional -EV players.
Because what this casino, and shufflemaster is doing is illegal.
check this out, had I know that some in our community were exploiting it.
I would have just quietly stopped playing the tables in question.
So while I am the bad guy here, I think there is blame to go around.
All it would have taken was a little heads up from my fellow AP's who could see where I was headed.
AP's, can't do that.
They are so goddam worried about someone finding out about one of their opportunities.
I didn't come up blackjack card clumping strategy this yesterday, out of the blue.
I first noticed this months ago and have been collecting data.
I have mentioned this several times on various sites, including the first thread I started just over 2 weeks agoSo you are admitting that you are "spiderman" on BJTF?
I didn't come up with this yesterday, out of the blue.
I first noticed this months ago and have been collecting data.
So you are admitting that you are "spiderman" on BJTF?
Oh there https://cetsolarstore.com/blackjack/zynga-poker-blackjack-nasl-oynanr.html coach belly doing what he does.
Yeah this will probably cost spiderman BJTF.
Kind of an unspoken agreement, to allow spiderman to participate.
Yeah this will probably cost spiderman BJTF.
Kind of an unspoken agreement, to allow spiderman to participate.
What's it called again when somebody adopts more than one forum user name?
And you have the nerve to call Alan deceitful?
I just have to say, if this is is true there's a way to take advantage of it.
You are telling me this a little late don't you think?
In the last 24 hours I have been under attack from all sides.
Someone claiming to be associated with shufflemaster, threatening me.
AP's, some who I considered friends, pissed at me, for outing a play, calling me traitor.
One threatened to reveal my name and address.
I am the bad guy here I guess.
But let me tell you how it really went win to blackjack ways />I am a card counter.
I never claimed to be the brightest bulb in the pack.
I dabble in other AP, if it's not too complicated, but mostly I am a card counter.
Card counting is how I have supported myself and made the vast majority of my living for 15 years now.
So as a card counter, I come across a situation, that I identified as cheating and bad for blackjack players, card counters and non-card counters regular players alike.
And I wanted to 1.
article source it turns out, just as you blackjack card clumping strategy, there are members in our community that figured this out before me and have found ways to exploit it.
AND they are now pissed at me.
But here's the problem.
I didn't come up with this yesterday, out of the blue.
I first noticed this months ago and have been collecting data.
I didn't want to make such an allegation, without being reasonably sure.
And during this time, I have mentioned this several times on various sites, including the first thread I started just over 2 weeks ago, at the same time I contacted you and several other AP's about my concerns.
So knowing that I was heading down this road, at no time did any of these AP's contact me.
Give me a heads up.
How about something like "hey you might not want to travel down that road".
And I still think someone needs to be looking out for card counters AND non-card counter traditional -EV players.
Because what this casino, and shufflemaster is doing is illegal.
BUT, had I know that some in our community were exploiting it.
I would have just quietly stopped playing the tables in question.
So while I am the bad guy here, I think there is blame to go around.
All it would have taken was a little heads up from my fellow AP's who could see where I was headed.
AP's, can't do that.
They are so goddam worried about someone finding out about one of their opportunities.
Don't get snotty with me.
I haven't criticized you or said anything derogitory.
I asked you a few questions regarding the Aces and a few other things.
TBH I didn't really read all that was going on and its hard to just imagine all the details without sitting down and playing or thinking about the scenario.
I have played very little live BJ for many many years now.
I would say that BJ is more your area of your expertise.
But given the limited information I read and limited time, I spent thinking about it.
I told you via PM a few days ago my quick thoughts about it, and I included that it would be exploitable.
If by no other advantage at minimum one could at least earn free high limit bet ratings knowing all hands would be a push, push, push, push.
That's all you have to know is that there's an advantage.
And once you think or know that there could be and advantage you move on to the next step.
Just remember, if it's not random there's always a good chance you can exploit it If it were me, and I thought it was remotely possible that it was exploitable, yet I couldn't figure out how or why myself, I would contact someone who I thought could.
My first thought wouldn't be to post up and expose the casino cheating.
AP is not always about being able to do something or figure something out all by yourself, It's also knowing when you don't know and then what to do next, and how to make money given the situation.
No deceit coach belly.
Spiderman never hid who he was.
He went out of his way to be transparent.
All the members knew and welcomed him.
Even those involved in the blowup years ago.
And here is what spiderman has done.
Only contributed in a positive manner, sharing experiences that may benefit other players and members.
Some members even commented on this.
Spiderman's helpful rating at BJTF is 100% 25 for 25.
And he received those 25 helpful rating in only 56 posts.
Clear evidence his only goal was to contribute positively.
Just as kewlj did for 5 years.
Isn't that what an blackjack AP site is all about?
Personally, I think Norm will be bigger than your spiteful blackjack card clumping strategy ass.
So here's my question for you coach belly.
What have you ever contributed in a positive fashion anywhere?
Who ever voted you as helpful and a positive contributor?
No deceit coach belly.
Spiderman never hid who he was.
You hid the fact that you are spiderman in the original blackjack card clumping strategy that started this thread.
Don't get snotty with me.
I haven't criticized you or said anything derogitory.
I wasn't getting snotty with you.
That post was not about you or implying you were involved in any way.
It just so happens your comment came at the wrong time and set me off about how these events unfolded.
I apologize if you mistook my comments to be about you.
But you have to admit that AP's are a back stabbing bunch.
It's like we are fighting a war against a common enemy, but at the same time, you need eyes in the back of your head to watch out for one of your "comrades" running up and stabbing you in the back.
Axel, I don't think like you, mickey, RS, monet or any of the really smart AP's.
I don't look at every game an see ways to beat it.
I wish I did.
I am not that smart.
I am a card counting blackjack player.
And it is through that lens that I see everything.


Blackjack Clumping and why this conditions beats you


294 295 296 297 298

Shuffle tracking in blackjack is sometimes referred to as card clump tracking because the strategy involves the blackjack player making an effort to keep track of´┐Ż...


COMMENTS:


24.12.2019 in 14:05 Zolojas:

Idea excellent, it agree with you.



20.12.2019 in 23:19 Kasar:

It is a pity, that now I can not express - it is compelled to leave. But I will return - I will necessarily write that I think on this question.



21.12.2019 in 21:38 Tukus:

It is possible to speak infinitely on this question.



18.12.2019 in 09:45 Mubar:

I confirm. It was and with me. Let's discuss this question. Here or in PM.



21.12.2019 in 19:52 Shaktikree:

In my opinion you are not right. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



19.12.2019 in 19:01 Faeshicage:

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are mistaken. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.



17.12.2019 in 22:10 Samule:

I consider, that you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.



25.12.2019 in 21:42 Voodoonris:

You are mistaken. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.



25.12.2019 in 08:55 Dinris:

Has understood not absolutely well.



26.12.2019 in 11:41 Temuro:

Certainly. I join told all above. We can communicate on this theme.



26.12.2019 in 04:41 Goltidal:

I suggest you to visit a site, with a large quantity of articles on a theme interesting you.



24.12.2019 in 18:53 Mom:

You commit an error. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



25.12.2019 in 00:54 Bragor:

In my opinion you are not right. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.



23.12.2019 in 12:58 Mezizilkree:

The excellent message))



25.12.2019 in 09:36 Tolkree:

Matchless topic



26.12.2019 in 14:13 Sar:

Also that we would do without your remarkable phrase



20.12.2019 in 21:08 Dojas:

Bravo, this brilliant phrase is necessary just by the way




Total 17 comments.